Solar Application Viability Screen Solarbe Global - Solar Futures Start with four practical checks: payer, operator, maintenance responsibility and local service path. Then decide whether the solar use case is suitable for sourcing, training or channel testing. Every use case should pass six checks: 1. Who pays? 2. Who operates? 3. Who maintains and owns the safety boundary? 4. Why do they pay now? 5. Are safety and compliance risks manageable? 6. Can this create a repeatable local service role, not only a good story? First-phase priority directions: 1. Irrigation as a service - Payer: farmers or cooperatives - Operator: farm owner, cooperative or irrigation service provider - Logic: water access changes crop timing, yields or paid service demand - Guardrail: qualified pump and electrical installation 2. Fish and farm cold-chain nodes - Payer: landing sites, markets, cooperatives or traders - Operator: cold-chain node owner or market service provider - Logic: spoilage loss is visible and storage can be paid for - Guardrail: hygiene, temperature control and clear limits for medical use 3. Solar drying and small agro-processing - Payer: farmers, processors or cooperatives - Operator: processor, cooperative or service team - Logic: post-harvest loss and price uplift can be calculated - Guardrail: food safety, moisture control and volume validation 4. E-bike and delivery charging - Payer: riders, fleets, sites or platforms - Operator: site owner, fleet operator or charging service provider - Logic: high-frequency charging demand and battery cost can be measured - Guardrail: battery safety, fire prevention and site responsibility 5. Institutional reliable power - Payer: clinics, schools, markets, NGOs, sponsors or operators - Operator: institution, EPC, facility manager or service partner - Logic: uptime supports critical services or shared infrastructure - Guardrail: qualified design, installation, maintenance and reporting Use carefully, but do not lead with: - Standalone low-ticket retail convenience uses - Phone charging kiosks without a site operator and repeatable demand - Standalone lighting uses without a payer and maintenance owner - Entertainment uses without safety and payment clarity - Printing, internet, barber or beauty stalls treated as isolated anecdotes These can help public education, but they are weak as first business lines unless bundled into a broader service model. Local service question: Which local problem is painful enough that someone will pay, who will operate, who will maintain, and which qualified partner can deliver safely?